Evaluation Criteria

Technical Innovation (25%)

Key Aspects:

  • Innovative use of AI/ML technologies
  • Technical complexity and sophistication
  • Integration of multiple technologies
  • Novel approach to problem-solving

Scoring Guide:

  • Exceptional (21-25): Groundbreaking innovation with advanced technical implementation
  • Strong (16-20): Creative solution with solid technical foundation
  • Good (11-15): Standard approach with some innovative elements
  • Basic (0-10): Minimal innovation or technical complexity

Solution Quality (25%)

Key Aspects:

  • Completeness of solution
  • Performance and efficiency
  • User experience and interface design
  • Error handling and robustness

Scoring Guide:

  • Exceptional (21-25): Polished, complete solution with excellent UX
  • Strong (16-20): Well-functioning solution with good user experience
  • Good (11-15): Basic functionality with acceptable user experience
  • Basic (0-10): Incomplete or poorly functioning solution

Code Quality (25%)

Key Aspects:

  • Clean, well-organized code structure
  • Proper documentation and comments
  • Use of design patterns and best practices
  • Code efficiency and maintainability

Scoring Guide:

  • Exceptional (21-25): Exemplary code quality with comprehensive documentation
  • Strong (16-20): Well-structured code with good documentation
  • Good (11-15): Readable code with basic documentation
  • Basic (0-10): Poor code organization or lack of documentation

Presentation & Communication (25%)

Key Aspects:

  • Clear presentation of solution
  • Technical depth in Q&A
  • Demo quality and preparation
  • Team collaboration and communication

Scoring Guide:

  • Exceptional (21-25): Outstanding presentation with excellent technical depth
  • Strong (16-20): Clear presentation with good technical understanding
  • Good (11-15): Adequate presentation with basic technical explanation
  • Basic (0-10): Poor presentation or lack of technical understanding

Bonus Points (Up to 10%)

  • Exceptional creativity in solution approach
  • Outstanding technical implementation
  • Excellent documentation and project organization
  • Strong potential for real-world impact

Note: Final scores will be normalized and may be adjusted based on the overall competition level and judges' consensus.